Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-22 04:21:40 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 074E7969CA56055B692815539ABD4E7B2CB2EB59793BB1A3E282A01F73E4CC1B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Misleading tweet. Citation needed. The Reuters article that was quote tweeted neither mentioned the amount of water needed to clean the fountain, or whether it was actually necessary to do so.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1660478384793690113
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 074E7969CA56055B692815539ABD4E7B2CB2EB59793BB1A3E282A01F73E4CC1B
  • createdAtMillis - 1684729300453
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1660478384793690113074E7969CA56055B692815539ABD4E7B2CB2EB59793BB1A3E282A01F73E4CC1B