Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-22 00:25:20 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CDBE5A44898725D8DCD3775DA9654543C7FF3DD910BBF1A9A0FE0220E7E1933D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN Even with its loose use of "objectively," this tweet is still a personal opinion, and counterarguments to its easy to contest stance, which many of these notes do a good job doing, should be kept in the comment section.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1660381125556989954
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CDBE5A44898725D8DCD3775DA9654543C7FF3DD910BBF1A9A0FE0220E7E1933D
  • createdAtMillis - 1684715120416
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1660381125556989954CDBE5A44898725D8DCD3775DA9654543C7FF3DD910BBF1A9A0FE0220E7E1933D