Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-21 01:11:13 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C1F09FEBFC2E696A2F43A27B42876904AE3DBA9F42168C467BDE4626F31E0F24
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet is not misleading. The 2018 paper is accurately linked and the screenshot accurately summarizes the opinion of the authors of the paper. The poster additionally expresses an opinion regarding the wisdom of publishing the paper - which notes should not opine on. https://twitter.com/bermaninstitute/status/988478344281935873?s=46&t=VGC-6jU8SfAP0hww4THRow

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1660040554057732096
participantId -
raterParticipantId - C1F09FEBFC2E696A2F43A27B42876904AE3DBA9F42168C467BDE4626F31E0F24
createdAtMillis - 1684631473194
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1660040554057732096C1F09FEBFC2E696A2F43A27B42876904AE3DBA9F42168C467BDE4626F31E0F24