Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-21 02:08:21 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7DA12F197FB2690F8D21C27B3934A32387E1BF4EE9609E8B2B9954CCFCFF1B57
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet is not misleading. The 2018 paper is accurately linked and the screenshot accurately summarizes the opinion of the authors of the paper. The poster additionally expresses an opinion regarding the wisdom of publishing the paper - which notes should not opine on. https://twitter.com/bermaninstitute/status/988478344281935873?s=46&t=VGC-6jU8SfAP0hww4THRow

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1660040554057732096
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 7DA12F197FB2690F8D21C27B3934A32387E1BF4EE9609E8B2B9954CCFCFF1B57
createdAtMillis - 1684634901979
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 16600405540577320967DA12F197FB2690F8D21C27B3934A32387E1BF4EE9609E8B2B9954CCFCFF1B57