Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-20 19:59:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 803A1079241C6E43E80E29DED17CB0AC5DCFD4B272577E0426F05DFEAFF0BDC6
Participant Details

Original Note:

Horowitz concluded there was no documentary bias but in his testimony indicated certain decisions could only be explained by concluding they were biased. The article should be corrected because it misleads the reading about what his conclusions were.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1660004009543958530
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 803A1079241C6E43E80E29DED17CB0AC5DCFD4B272577E0426F05DFEAFF0BDC6
  • createdAtMillis - 1684612749316
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1660004009543958530803A1079241C6E43E80E29DED17CB0AC5DCFD4B272577E0426F05DFEAFF0BDC6