Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-20 19:59:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1FDA123FA3452FA3B3E7BC64166C42FA47CDD4D427E399091D3B261CB087A6D5
Participant Details

Original Note:

Horowitz concluded there was no documentary bias but in his testimony indicated certain decisions could only be explained by concluding they were biased. The article should be corrected because it misleads the reading about what his conclusions were.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1660004009543958530
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1FDA123FA3452FA3B3E7BC64166C42FA47CDD4D427E399091D3B261CB087A6D5
  • createdAtMillis - 1684612749316
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 16600040095439585301FDA123FA3452FA3B3E7BC64166C42FA47CDD4D427E399091D3B261CB087A6D5