Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-22 10:37:00 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 53DFE93AD4B59D26D03EF0E18292CD4EABB5753AE72A50D03AB0A447F61D7847
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet already acknowledges the ruling of the court in favour of Banks, so a note is not needed to point this out.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1659897192096710660
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 53DFE93AD4B59D26D03EF0E18292CD4EABB5753AE72A50D03AB0A447F61D7847
  • createdAtMillis - 1713782220792
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 165989719209671066053DFE93AD4B59D26D03EF0E18292CD4EABB5753AE72A50D03AB0A447F61D7847