Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-20 08:04:24 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: ECA592BFC34920D16AEFC016AAB38F1846CA4EA7E4073771982FCB98A7128548
Participant Details

Original Note:

This story has been debunked. A similar report was documented in 2020. See reference links below. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/06/200612111434.htm https://spectator.sme.sk/c/23171008/shmu-debunks-radiation-hoax.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1659745654237720577
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - ECA592BFC34920D16AEFC016AAB38F1846CA4EA7E4073771982FCB98A7128548
  • createdAtMillis - 1684569864439
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1659745654237720577ECA592BFC34920D16AEFC016AAB38F1846CA4EA7E4073771982FCB98A7128548