Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-19 20:09:11 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3AB3EBC4032AB59B267F4BA919DA4F126A3ED7D584E31AE74171DA018460A2B9
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Suggested note is not factually correct as the article linked in tweet clearly says in the article, “Opponents of the book criticized the book's reference to sexual activities.” https://t.co/wINrDXjlPg The suggested notes context is redundant and outside of the intended scope of Notes.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1659598201899433984
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3AB3EBC4032AB59B267F4BA919DA4F126A3ED7D584E31AE74171DA018460A2B9
  • createdAtMillis - 1684526951660
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16595982018994339843AB3EBC4032AB59B267F4BA919DA4F126A3ED7D584E31AE74171DA018460A2B9