Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-19 17:58:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3081CC1AF08CF496B9AC7BE8C8BDF1108C753934F06590D79355F31A9D98239B
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Suggested note is not factually correct as the article linked in tweet clearly says in the article, “Opponents of the book criticized the book's reference to sexual activities.” https://t.co/wINrDXjlPg The suggested notes context is redundant and outside of the intended scope of Notes.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1659598201899433984
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3081CC1AF08CF496B9AC7BE8C8BDF1108C753934F06590D79355F31A9D98239B
  • createdAtMillis - 1684519119624
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16595982018994339843081CC1AF08CF496B9AC7BE8C8BDF1108C753934F06590D79355F31A9D98239B