Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-05-19 13:17:06 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: C9A3C05639255A9348A1345622F6D075B1F941EE8ACE59580A09FE89AB02D199
Participant Details
Original Note:
The Court found that: 1. The TED Talk was defamatory of Mr Banks. 2. There was a significant change of circumstances, such that the public interest defence ceased to apply. https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Banks-v-Cadwalladr-130622-Judgment.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwiirLWRs4H_AhVkSkEAHVB1AZ4QFnoECAgQAQ&usg=AOvVaw0vrdsN7y-FF_kdgFtbnZeA
All Note Details