Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-05-19 15:41:50 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: C491361EB49EFB1ACED3E074A5755A240840ABB72E23FDD1AD732560E79DB40A
Participant Details
Original Note:
The Court found that: 1. The TED Talk was defamatory of Mr Banks. 2. There was a significant change of circumstances, such that the public interest defence ceased to apply. https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Banks-v-Cadwalladr-130622-Judgment.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwiirLWRs4H_AhVkSkEAHVB1AZ4QFnoECAgQAQ&usg=AOvVaw0vrdsN7y-FF_kdgFtbnZeA
All Note Details