Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-05-19 14:03:06 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 94C0EA49C0C5FB293C59272BAFAAF729A4945891F3E827121C2D92A0E20663D3
Participant Details
Original Note:
The Court found that: 1. The TED Talk was defamatory of Mr Banks. 2. There was a significant change of circumstances, such that the public interest defence ceased to apply. https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Banks-v-Cadwalladr-130622-Judgment.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwiirLWRs4H_AhVkSkEAHVB1AZ4QFnoECAgQAQ&usg=AOvVaw0vrdsN7y-FF_kdgFtbnZeA
All Note Details