Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-05-19 15:15:49 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 268D136151DB769C00FD08F6087D1DD9CAFF80B50C1C7FDFFCC63D6C759F9A5C
Participant Details
Original Note:
The Court found that: 1. The TED Talk was defamatory of Mr Banks. 2. There was a significant change of circumstances, such that the public interest defence ceased to apply. https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Banks-v-Cadwalladr-130622-Judgment.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwiirLWRs4H_AhVkSkEAHVB1AZ4QFnoECAgQAQ&usg=AOvVaw0vrdsN7y-FF_kdgFtbnZeA
All Note Details