Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-05-20 10:31:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 1990994178F2965E44EC3711F4FF39E19782D705B15E92F7A6C4D1383B9D96FE
Participant Details
Original Note:
The Court found that: 1. The TED Talk was defamatory of Mr Banks. 2. There was a significant change of circumstances, such that the public interest defence ceased to apply. https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Banks-v-Cadwalladr-130622-Judgment.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwiirLWRs4H_AhVkSkEAHVB1AZ4QFnoECAgQAQ&usg=AOvVaw0vrdsN7y-FF_kdgFtbnZeA
All Note Details