Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-19 12:20:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 68A85EF82F5FC120C5FE02B2E27F48C583E6AB6A71B07CA0C34A218503C216A8
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. There is nothing factually incorrect or misleading about this Tweet. A person’s lawyer claiming to have proof of something isn’t incontrovertible evidence and the tweet wouldn’t be misinfo even if it was.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1659526055550484482
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 68A85EF82F5FC120C5FE02B2E27F48C583E6AB6A71B07CA0C34A218503C216A8
  • createdAtMillis - 1684498834037
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 165952605555048448268A85EF82F5FC120C5FE02B2E27F48C583E6AB6A71B07CA0C34A218503C216A8