Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-19 13:15:18 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4C569515CE0604FCA1C6F7B0537E23C26AFF0B36D5EED4966CCDCC65DD5EC6A3
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. There is nothing factually incorrect or misleading about this Tweet. A person’s lawyer claiming to have proof of something isn’t incontrovertible evidence and the tweet wouldn’t be misinfo even if it was.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1659526055550484482
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4C569515CE0604FCA1C6F7B0537E23C26AFF0B36D5EED4966CCDCC65DD5EC6A3
  • createdAtMillis - 1684502118432
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16595260555504844824C569515CE0604FCA1C6F7B0537E23C26AFF0B36D5EED4966CCDCC65DD5EC6A3