Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-19 14:22:10 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1D6C0E4C7FE4C000BBC182417ED2F33C7EF6D9B9E961B65B3E93845B66DBBE2A
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. There is nothing factually incorrect or misleading about this Tweet. A person’s lawyer claiming to have proof of something isn’t incontrovertible evidence and the tweet wouldn’t be misinfo even if it was.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1659526055550484482
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1D6C0E4C7FE4C000BBC182417ED2F33C7EF6D9B9E961B65B3E93845B66DBBE2A
  • createdAtMillis - 1684506130654
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16595260555504844821D6C0E4C7FE4C000BBC182417ED2F33C7EF6D9B9E961B65B3E93845B66DBBE2A