Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-19 16:10:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 97DFB4B187DD19C8EED343E2A77DAEAAF09F007B298BF9E59F87884055FAE864
Participant Details

Original Note:

Ms. Smith's tweet directly addresses the first question the ethics commissioner was asked. In addition, her attached letter addresses the other questions. Hence there is nothing misleading about the tweet nor is context missing. The comissioner's report is here: https://www.ethicscommissioner.ab.ca/media/3124/allegations-involving-premier-danielle-smith-may-17-2023.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1659330130974752769
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 97DFB4B187DD19C8EED343E2A77DAEAAF09F007B298BF9E59F87884055FAE864
  • createdAtMillis - 1684512609425
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 165933013097475276997DFB4B187DD19C8EED343E2A77DAEAAF09F007B298BF9E59F87884055FAE864