Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-19 03:58:58 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 41674291E1824402F4181E8489053AEC0136CCBC72BF4AAE5B538636BBD9DBD1
Participant Details

Original Note:

Ms. Smith's tweet directly addresses the first question the ethics commissioner was asked. In addition, her attached letter addresses the other questions. Hence there is nothing misleading about the tweet nor is context missing. The comissioner's report is here: https://www.ethicscommissioner.ab.ca/media/3124/allegations-involving-premier-danielle-smith-may-17-2023.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1659330130974752769
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 41674291E1824402F4181E8489053AEC0136CCBC72BF4AAE5B538636BBD9DBD1
  • createdAtMillis - 1684468738556
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 165933013097475276941674291E1824402F4181E8489053AEC0136CCBC72BF4AAE5B538636BBD9DBD1