Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-18 23:34:59 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 14EFB35197038B468BC6B4F7456FC20A6AB3A44933981F6C66E0DED360313418
Participant Details

Original Note:

Ms. Smith's tweet directly addresses the first question the ethics commissioner was asked. In addition, her attached letter addresses the other questions. Hence there is nothing misleading about the tweet nor is context missing. The comissioner's report is here: https://www.ethicscommissioner.ab.ca/media/3124/allegations-involving-premier-danielle-smith-may-17-2023.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1659330130974752769
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 14EFB35197038B468BC6B4F7456FC20A6AB3A44933981F6C66E0DED360313418
  • createdAtMillis - 1684452899782
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 165933013097475276914EFB35197038B468BC6B4F7456FC20A6AB3A44933981F6C66E0DED360313418