Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-19 02:02:48 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D4A9C40AB6BAE0DA4C3F4932DCEE20072C5B0F8B7ADED1EE5E1F89CCD90E6E37
Participant Details

Original Note:

The suggested notes go off on a tangent, and are not relevant to the tweet. They are simply someone's opinion on a controversial surgery, which is more suited for a reply, not a note. Additionally, the sources provided are largely biased, which lowers their credibility.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1659319913440215040
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D4A9C40AB6BAE0DA4C3F4932DCEE20072C5B0F8B7ADED1EE5E1F89CCD90E6E37
  • createdAtMillis - 1684461768431
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1659319913440215040D4A9C40AB6BAE0DA4C3F4932DCEE20072C5B0F8B7ADED1EE5E1F89CCD90E6E37