Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-20 01:42:35 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 955C1C9E626553A55FE116EA4E263A01220B6E8356F503C24C848F8AA836002B
Participant Details

Original Note:

The suggested notes go off on a tangent, and are not relevant to the tweet. They are simply someone's opinion on a controversial surgery, which is more suited for a reply, not a note. Additionally, the sources provided are largely biased, which lowers their credibility.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1659319913440215040
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 955C1C9E626553A55FE116EA4E263A01220B6E8356F503C24C848F8AA836002B
  • createdAtMillis - 1684546955941
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1659319913440215040955C1C9E626553A55FE116EA4E263A01220B6E8356F503C24C848F8AA836002B