Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-19 05:18:38 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D2FCA00B71D6A31EEB13F385AC2D3C273CEBB7F1EA8A041C88129B89053965DC
Participant Details

Original Note:

THE "FINDINGS", ON PAGE 13/14 CLEARLY STATE THAT D. SMITH HAD NOT BEEN FOUND GUILTY OF ANY WRONG DOING IN REGARDS TO THE ETHICS OF THE DISPUTE. https://www.ethicscommissioner.ab.ca/media/3124/allegations-involving-premier-danielle-smith-may-17-2023.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1659317810059771905
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D2FCA00B71D6A31EEB13F385AC2D3C273CEBB7F1EA8A041C88129B89053965DC
  • createdAtMillis - 1684473518432
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1659317810059771905D2FCA00B71D6A31EEB13F385AC2D3C273CEBB7F1EA8A041C88129B89053965DC