Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-19 16:10:16 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E6D5F0E4898BFB4BDFF927EAEB4918AE93AF03B72C706009AD91C0E2522E7C16
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet very clearly states it is solely addressing "regarding Crown Prosecutor contact", twice. No note needed

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1659278479102210067
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E6D5F0E4898BFB4BDFF927EAEB4918AE93AF03B72C706009AD91C0E2522E7C16
  • createdAtMillis - 1684512616589
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1659278479102210067E6D5F0E4898BFB4BDFF927EAEB4918AE93AF03B72C706009AD91C0E2522E7C16