Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-18 21:07:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0A9B5FF633C93E7AB21EAF6DB46D5E5862FA8311EC23A83F694067E75E31EA6E
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet very clearly states it is solely addressing "regarding Crown Prosecutor contact", twice. No note needed

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1659278479102210067
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0A9B5FF633C93E7AB21EAF6DB46D5E5862FA8311EC23A83F694067E75E31EA6E
  • createdAtMillis - 1684444054620
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16592784791022100670A9B5FF633C93E7AB21EAF6DB46D5E5862FA8311EC23A83F694067E75E31EA6E