Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-18 20:26:20 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 595FAECC17F2F460F3542BB99FC1E6D4D9BC066D4F0702C14C0A5C8C4CE4104D
Participant Details

Original Note:

The twit offers debate on the subject stating author's position and his intention to prove it. Arguing against/for such position in CN will only create unnecessary and misplaced noise.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1659240170833444879
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 595FAECC17F2F460F3542BB99FC1E6D4D9BC066D4F0702C14C0A5C8C4CE4104D
  • createdAtMillis - 1684441580270
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1659240170833444879595FAECC17F2F460F3542BB99FC1E6D4D9BC066D4F0702C14C0A5C8C4CE4104D