Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-18 22:12:04 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 46505CF84E6B0E266AA0CAD5CCE633ADEB66A0E274872E2181DFF8FFAB08BF9E
Participant Details

Original Note:

If meant to be satirical, shouldn’t it be labeled as such? To those thinking a reply would be more appropriate-I, respectfully, disagree. Countering obviously untrue fringe claims must be as user facing and timely as the falsehood for effective moderation to develop.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1659225971927425024
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 46505CF84E6B0E266AA0CAD5CCE633ADEB66A0E274872E2181DFF8FFAB08BF9E
  • createdAtMillis - 1684447924756
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 165922597192742502446505CF84E6B0E266AA0CAD5CCE633ADEB66A0E274872E2181DFF8FFAB08BF9E