Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-18 18:09:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EDF35A38909E01A6629F64A416D6846819A49DE23F2A5C85E589F05E25F3A42B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Neither case, in Virginia or England, were criminal cases and both were civil cases in defamation. The "balance of probabilities" standard of proof used by the English courts is the same test as the "preponderance of the evidence" used in the American courts.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1659153798181552128
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EDF35A38909E01A6629F64A416D6846819A49DE23F2A5C85E589F05E25F3A42B
  • createdAtMillis - 1684433349528
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1659153798181552128EDF35A38909E01A6629F64A416D6846819A49DE23F2A5C85E589F05E25F3A42B