Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-18 16:07:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8A356DC4651A60FD01FA4B3D73F9E6D73733D79B26703089F5D87A255EA898F3
Participant Details

Original Note:

Neither case, in Virginia or England, were criminal cases and both were civil cases in defamation. The "balance of probabilities" standard of proof used by the English courts is the same test as the "preponderance of the evidence" used in the American courts.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1659153798181552128
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8A356DC4651A60FD01FA4B3D73F9E6D73733D79B26703089F5D87A255EA898F3
  • createdAtMillis - 1684426054493
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16591537981815521288A356DC4651A60FD01FA4B3D73F9E6D73733D79B26703089F5D87A255EA898F3