Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-21 18:38:37 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 54DFD39A8E8C988F943DFE08B52E25C710623DBB33A026A801B7285BB6718290
Participant Details

Original Note:

Neither case, in Virginia or England, were criminal cases and both were civil cases in defamation. The "balance of probabilities" standard of proof used by the English courts is the same test as the "preponderance of the evidence" used in the American courts.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1659153798181552128
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 54DFD39A8E8C988F943DFE08B52E25C710623DBB33A026A801B7285BB6718290
  • createdAtMillis - 1684694317408
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 165915379818155212854DFD39A8E8C988F943DFE08B52E25C710623DBB33A026A801B7285BB6718290