Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-18 16:45:30 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4C7308CBD08B010D29FBA7A2B11202E04101F0D2308F22CA2E5BF181D8680CC8
Participant Details

Original Note:

Neither case, in Virginia or England, were criminal cases and both were civil cases in defamation. The "balance of probabilities" standard of proof used by the English courts is the same test as the "preponderance of the evidence" used in the American courts.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1659153798181552128
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4C7308CBD08B010D29FBA7A2B11202E04101F0D2308F22CA2E5BF181D8680CC8
  • createdAtMillis - 1684428330743
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16591537981815521284C7308CBD08B010D29FBA7A2B11202E04101F0D2308F22CA2E5BF181D8680CC8