Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-14 05:45:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E505B19AA80E9CFBBF202E84E6DA63800EAA1B5AB3E38A72B8AEA14D8C7BF082
Participant Details

Original Note:

this possibly does need a note, but both the tweet source and the source in the current note https://euvsdisinfo.eu/report/fresh-fbi-document-reveals-that-cia-backed-those-responsible-of-the-9-11-attacks are very one sided. i can't find anything impartial that's talking about this. which probably means the story is wild speculation based on nothing, but I'm not sure how you show that?

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1659072779151634435
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E505B19AA80E9CFBBF202E84E6DA63800EAA1B5AB3E38A72B8AEA14D8C7BF082
  • createdAtMillis - 1726292730057
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1659072779151634435E505B19AA80E9CFBBF202E84E6DA63800EAA1B5AB3E38A72B8AEA14D8C7BF082