Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-18 06:06:57 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C4B05E706762A4F1D16CB17D68BF7603351E72BBA583081705CB41C41BD2F3B4
Participant Details

Original Note:

the note accusing bellingcat gave just one source and most of that source is "opinion or speculation" https://mronline.org/2021/04/12/how-bellingcat-launders-national-security-state-talking-points-into-the-press/ most of it accuses their journalists of being untrustworthy for having relevant expertise the most credible accusation in the text is supported by a link that leads to a 404

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1659057920766803968
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C4B05E706762A4F1D16CB17D68BF7603351E72BBA583081705CB41C41BD2F3B4
  • createdAtMillis - 1684390017042
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1659057920766803968C4B05E706762A4F1D16CB17D68BF7603351E72BBA583081705CB41C41BD2F3B4