Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-19 05:31:08 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 83B2889810FFC3D6DC832BE0E793A8C468F0C6A335204D5B7E4045F429651CF1
Participant Details

Original Note:

the note accusing bellingcat gave just one source and most of that source is "opinion or speculation" https://mronline.org/2021/04/12/how-bellingcat-launders-national-security-state-talking-points-into-the-press/ most of it accuses their journalists of being untrustworthy for having relevant expertise the most credible accusation in the text is supported by a link that leads to a 404

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1659057920766803968
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 83B2889810FFC3D6DC832BE0E793A8C468F0C6A335204D5B7E4045F429651CF1
  • createdAtMillis - 1684474268961
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 165905792076680396883B2889810FFC3D6DC832BE0E793A8C468F0C6A335204D5B7E4045F429651CF1