Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-17 23:34:02 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BD94C13C083BBAE9362BE3B919273068A4E501B914E009CEA56328A814E8DD7C
Participant Details

Original Note:

This did not happen. The follow-up tweet, from 3 hours later, shows that this Tweeter interpreted "It raises questions about his character and WHETHER HE SHOULD BE IN CONGRESS" in a way that absolutely no one else would interpret it.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1658967897513787392
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BD94C13C083BBAE9362BE3B919273068A4E501B914E009CEA56328A814E8DD7C
  • createdAtMillis - 1684366442448
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1658967897513787392BD94C13C083BBAE9362BE3B919273068A4E501B914E009CEA56328A814E8DD7C