Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-18 04:50:23 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 03511417B75B3754EF28594E2B0A2CD63940E426B7EACEE7C1F31670CD8C9B44
Participant Details

Original Note:

This did not happen. The follow-up tweet, from 3 hours later, shows that this Tweeter interpreted "It raises questions about his character and WHETHER HE SHOULD BE IN CONGRESS" in a way that absolutely no one else would interpret it.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1658967897513787392
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 03511417B75B3754EF28594E2B0A2CD63940E426B7EACEE7C1F31670CD8C9B44
  • createdAtMillis - 1684385423199
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 165896789751378739203511417B75B3754EF28594E2B0A2CD63940E426B7EACEE7C1F31670CD8C9B44