Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-17 22:56:08 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E367A9E68226F9A5DE92CF761CE4098A1B1309ECD53C7B8E16BE491BCFCE4D36
Participant Details

Original Note:

Quote on Opinion piece. *The NR is a conservative outlet, and the author is expressing his opinion https://www.nationalreview.com/about/ Per Communities Notes Purpose: Note Not Needed Community Notes Purpose: https://t.co/hC79OlTIGw Community Notes Examples: https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/examples

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1658957909789925377
participantId -
raterParticipantId - E367A9E68226F9A5DE92CF761CE4098A1B1309ECD53C7B8E16BE491BCFCE4D36
createdAtMillis - 1684364168492
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1658957909789925377E367A9E68226F9A5DE92CF761CE4098A1B1309ECD53C7B8E16BE491BCFCE4D36