Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-17 23:19:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 520D238DD51E609650127C7FBF18AA347A187F3068073C73E4FAD7C49B1AD8DA
Participant Details

Original Note:

Quote on Opinion piece. *The NR is a conservative outlet, and the author is expressing his opinion https://www.nationalreview.com/about/ Per Communities Notes Purpose: Note Not Needed Community Notes Purpose: https://t.co/hC79OlTIGw Community Notes Examples: https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/examples

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1658957909789925377
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 520D238DD51E609650127C7FBF18AA347A187F3068073C73E4FAD7C49B1AD8DA
createdAtMillis - 1684365584458
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1658957909789925377520D238DD51E609650127C7FBF18AA347A187F3068073C73E4FAD7C49B1AD8DA