Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-17 10:55:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BB4069B96496D7B77317A355ECB89F66B875FD842C5E3AC6F318740E9814A33E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet is not misleading: “People often use ‘court packing’ to describe changes to the size of the Supreme Court, but it's better understood as any effort to manipulate the Court's membership for partisan ends.” https://www.rutgers.edu/news/what-court-packing

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1658623241106214912
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BB4069B96496D7B77317A355ECB89F66B875FD842C5E3AC6F318740E9814A33E
  • createdAtMillis - 1684320929242
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1658623241106214912BB4069B96496D7B77317A355ECB89F66B875FD842C5E3AC6F318740E9814A33E