Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-17 00:21:35 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: ADEEC4437ED757FDAEC769C5F27C2B8B9353A267B94185374C0DD51CEA174B60
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet is not misleading: “People often use ‘court packing’ to describe changes to the size of the Supreme Court, but it's better understood as any effort to manipulate the Court's membership for partisan ends.” https://www.rutgers.edu/news/what-court-packing

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1658623241106214912
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - ADEEC4437ED757FDAEC769C5F27C2B8B9353A267B94185374C0DD51CEA174B60
  • createdAtMillis - 1684282895734
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1658623241106214912ADEEC4437ED757FDAEC769C5F27C2B8B9353A267B94185374C0DD51CEA174B60