Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-17 12:58:06 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6D30A2E24F90A7F30415AE17C1C79FF763C6E4ECB8B79F436305D53FBAF9C379
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet is not misleading: “People often use ‘court packing’ to describe changes to the size of the Supreme Court, but it's better understood as any effort to manipulate the Court's membership for partisan ends.” https://www.rutgers.edu/news/what-court-packing

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1658623241106214912
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6D30A2E24F90A7F30415AE17C1C79FF763C6E4ECB8B79F436305D53FBAF9C379
  • createdAtMillis - 1684328286346
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16586232411062149126D30A2E24F90A7F30415AE17C1C79FF763C6E4ECB8B79F436305D53FBAF9C379