Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-17 04:23:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 61E9B53C3A002DBA1731B50309E108551B9671F6C892EB2A555815A242850F4B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet is not misleading: “People often use ‘court packing’ to describe changes to the size of the Supreme Court, but it's better understood as any effort to manipulate the Court's membership for partisan ends.” https://www.rutgers.edu/news/what-court-packing

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1658623241106214912
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 61E9B53C3A002DBA1731B50309E108551B9671F6C892EB2A555815A242850F4B
  • createdAtMillis - 1684297410067
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 165862324110621491261E9B53C3A002DBA1731B50309E108551B9671F6C892EB2A555815A242850F4B