Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-16 23:47:27 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A873A0A496331BFAE0DC40BC7C3A3F04F64DD2EA0AB653B245BC3C57C47C9467
Participant Details

Original Note:

Study was already cited in quoted tweet. People can read it for themselves. NNN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1658609614164750336
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A873A0A496331BFAE0DC40BC7C3A3F04F64DD2EA0AB653B245BC3C57C47C9467
  • createdAtMillis - 1684280847593
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1658609614164750336A873A0A496331BFAE0DC40BC7C3A3F04F64DD2EA0AB653B245BC3C57C47C9467