Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-17 08:41:58 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 778339AB5A98764469CD7778FBA1CBFD45D316E462A8C7F0F2C55E0A39FA9F54
Participant Details

Original Note:

Notes are missing the key point. Tweet is not taking credit for the job gains. It doesn’t even mention his policies. It’s states a factually correct claim about the numbers and then gives personal/political opinion on how a default will affect those number. Notes not needed https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/values

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1658478197372235779
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 778339AB5A98764469CD7778FBA1CBFD45D316E462A8C7F0F2C55E0A39FA9F54
  • createdAtMillis - 1684312918631
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1658478197372235779778339AB5A98764469CD7778FBA1CBFD45D316E462A8C7F0F2C55E0A39FA9F54