Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-16 17:07:40 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 194E867853A4B137AE6EE96625240BD2E63590EA8AAE8784096120FB68AE9805
Participant Details

Original Note:

Notes are missing the key point. Tweet is not taking credit for the job gains. It doesn’t even mention his policies. It’s states a factually correct claim about the numbers and then gives personal/political opinion on how a default will affect those number. Notes not needed https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/values

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1658478197372235779
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 194E867853A4B137AE6EE96625240BD2E63590EA8AAE8784096120FB68AE9805
  • createdAtMillis - 1684256860353
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1658478197372235779194E867853A4B137AE6EE96625240BD2E63590EA8AAE8784096120FB68AE9805