Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-16 14:23:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 20EC9135C9C5958EDF0F996E76404522C4A2AD32AFB9261E8E3084F3EA5B09D1
Participant Details

Original Note:

Multiple audits/court cases have shown that there was NO evidence of election fraud. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2103619118

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1658409708267479040
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 20EC9135C9C5958EDF0F996E76404522C4A2AD32AFB9261E8E3084F3EA5B09D1
  • createdAtMillis - 1684247031148
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 165840970826747904020EC9135C9C5958EDF0F996E76404522C4A2AD32AFB9261E8E3084F3EA5B09D1