Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-16 04:44:38 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C547609F84000C46DCEB09377FF95F731406CCF5CEFEDC9EE45BB3E190BBA160
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet is merely stating the results of the Durham investigation. It makes no further claims. No note is needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1658284848820244486
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C547609F84000C46DCEB09377FF95F731406CCF5CEFEDC9EE45BB3E190BBA160
  • createdAtMillis - 1684212278185
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1658284848820244486C547609F84000C46DCEB09377FF95F731406CCF5CEFEDC9EE45BB3E190BBA160