Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-16 07:00:02 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 891F4E68DBBA899AE3B10A000DEE44A8831872ECF0116A92643F92925E7DF7C3
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet is merely stating the results of the Durham investigation. It makes no further claims. No note is needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1658284848820244486
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 891F4E68DBBA899AE3B10A000DEE44A8831872ECF0116A92643F92925E7DF7C3
  • createdAtMillis - 1684220402287
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1658284848820244486891F4E68DBBA899AE3B10A000DEE44A8831872ECF0116A92643F92925E7DF7C3