Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-16 06:54:11 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6600860983B71D4D8F219631E2B3FE870B7A93EA5F4E4885A2C82462494E0BB6
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet is merely stating the results of the Durham investigation. It makes no further claims. No note is needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1658284848820244486
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6600860983B71D4D8F219631E2B3FE870B7A93EA5F4E4885A2C82462494E0BB6
  • createdAtMillis - 1684220051116
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16582848488202444866600860983B71D4D8F219631E2B3FE870B7A93EA5F4E4885A2C82462494E0BB6